A confusing analysis. As I read the constitutional documents I could find nothing to take exception to but then "the devil is in the details" as always, is it not? What came after is more telling.
My reaction to the changes brought about in the name of Vatican II is that they seem to have been unnecessary. It addressed a problem some ha…
A confusing analysis. As I read the constitutional documents I could find nothing to take exception to but then "the devil is in the details" as always, is it not? What came after is more telling.
My reaction to the changes brought about in the name of Vatican II is that they seem to have been unnecessary. It addressed a problem some have described -convincingly- as nonexistent. However it seems to have provided an opportunity to 'modernize' (read secularize) the church. The year it ended,1965, ushered in the moral decay of the West especially of the USA. Moral decay of the most depraved sort became rampant reaching into the church itself. At this point we seem to actually be heading rapidly for the end of civilization itself.
A confusing analysis. As I read the constitutional documents I could find nothing to take exception to but then "the devil is in the details" as always, is it not? What came after is more telling.
My reaction to the changes brought about in the name of Vatican II is that they seem to have been unnecessary. It addressed a problem some have described -convincingly- as nonexistent. However it seems to have provided an opportunity to 'modernize' (read secularize) the church. The year it ended,1965, ushered in the moral decay of the West especially of the USA. Moral decay of the most depraved sort became rampant reaching into the church itself. At this point we seem to actually be heading rapidly for the end of civilization itself.
Not an event to celebrate but to overcome.