I never said that it did. I said the short notice and the disdain for the varying levels of struggle that working people can have made my blood boil. I'm all for celebrating HDO's on transferred days as long as the schedule is known sufficiently in advance and as long as the obligation is clear. But if we're talking about mortal sin rela…
I never said that it did. I said the short notice and the disdain for the varying levels of struggle that working people can have made my blood boil. I'm all for celebrating HDO's on transferred days as long as the schedule is known sufficiently in advance and as long as the obligation is clear. But if we're talking about mortal sin related to canonical matters, those doing the binding and loosing have an obligation not to bind too tightly. As far as I can see, they are not taking that obligation seriously, though it's dangerous for me to make that conclusion without seeing the full text.
My response has nothing whatsoever to do with disrespect for Our Lady. God forbid that I should hold her privileges in disdain.
I never said that it did. I said the short notice and the disdain for the varying levels of struggle that working people can have made my blood boil. I'm all for celebrating HDO's on transferred days as long as the schedule is known sufficiently in advance and as long as the obligation is clear. But if we're talking about mortal sin related to canonical matters, those doing the binding and loosing have an obligation not to bind too tightly. As far as I can see, they are not taking that obligation seriously, though it's dangerous for me to make that conclusion without seeing the full text.
My response has nothing whatsoever to do with disrespect for Our Lady. God forbid that I should hold her privileges in disdain.