You're not wrong - that's how it's sold each year. And it does in fact sound like it's turned into more of a fund to help keep the Vatican afloat rather than being used to help feed the hungry, clothe the naked, etc. I guess you could make an argument that funding the Vatican in general does indirectly contribute towards those ends, but …
You're not wrong - that's how it's sold each year. And it does in fact sound like it's turned into more of a fund to help keep the Vatican afloat rather than being used to help feed the hungry, clothe the naked, etc. I guess you could make an argument that funding the Vatican in general does indirectly contribute towards those ends, but that doesn't have the same ring to it as the current feel good campaign that they currently use to advertise the collection.
You're not wrong - that's how it's sold each year. And it does in fact sound like it's turned into more of a fund to help keep the Vatican afloat rather than being used to help feed the hungry, clothe the naked, etc. I guess you could make an argument that funding the Vatican in general does indirectly contribute towards those ends, but that doesn't have the same ring to it as the current feel good campaign that they currently use to advertise the collection.