Wait, there were listening sessions before in any widespread way? They seem to have been most notable by their absence. I know that I found out about them happening when I read (probably here) that the time had passed; I know that here there were no emails here to the clergy generally about them, as I checked. This new round should have …
Wait, there were listening sessions before in any widespread way? They seem to have been most notable by their absence. I know that I found out about them happening when I read (probably here) that the time had passed; I know that here there were no emails here to the clergy generally about them, as I checked. This new round should have been done before the 'national phase'; (arch)dioceses should have been sent back until they had a representative sample, or simply ignored. I strongly suspect that the results would have been different in important ways. I don't much see the point now.
Wait, there were listening sessions before in any widespread way? They seem to have been most notable by their absence. I know that I found out about them happening when I read (probably here) that the time had passed; I know that here there were no emails here to the clergy generally about them, as I checked. This new round should have been done before the 'national phase'; (arch)dioceses should have been sent back until they had a representative sample, or simply ignored. I strongly suspect that the results would have been different in important ways. I don't much see the point now.
It was in my parish bulletin at the time with a number of sessions and where and when they would occur.