Thank you for the canon law explanations. It would appear not much has changed. Total authority in many of these resides with the Bishop. Totalitarianism. If the Bishop is in any way flawed, so go the rules. It needs another revision.
Thank you for the canon law explanations. It would appear not much has changed. Total authority in many of these resides with the Bishop. Totalitarianism. If the Bishop is in any way flawed, so go the rules. It needs another revision.
Well said Eugene....This is one of the most astonishing issues here. The Holy See relies тАУ for better or worse тАУ on the local ordinaries! Huge risk, I find this plain absurd. Since when are local bishops, flawless and infallible!?
My point exactly- let alone how flawless and infallible the BISHOPS are, to rely solely on THEM? What if they themselves are the authors of evil or its cover up?
Thank you for the canon law explanations. It would appear not much has changed. Total authority in many of these resides with the Bishop. Totalitarianism. If the Bishop is in any way flawed, so go the rules. It needs another revision.
Well said Eugene....This is one of the most astonishing issues here. The Holy See relies тАУ for better or worse тАУ on the local ordinaries! Huge risk, I find this plain absurd. Since when are local bishops, flawless and infallible!?
What if I told you the Pope isn't flawless and infallible (except in very specific instances)?
My point exactly- let alone how flawless and infallible the BISHOPS are, to rely solely on THEM? What if they themselves are the authors of evil or its cover up?