I'm not a theologian or a canonist, but wouldn't the simulation of a sacrament be a grave sin? And how is this not a scandalous invitation to such a simulation?
Also, how are we supposed to interpret the phrase "the theological view of St. Peter's Church"? Are individual parishes authorised to hold and/or promulgate their own theological views now?
I'm not a theologian or a canonist, but wouldn't the simulation of a sacrament be a grave sin? And how is this not a scandalous invitation to such a simulation?
Also, how are we supposed to interpret the phrase "the theological view of St. Peter's Church"? Are individual parishes authorised to hold and/or promulgate their own theological views now?
“the team, who have also insisted that putting the installation in a confessional was a practical decision meant to encourage “moments of intimacy” with the hologram, but not meant to suggest Catholics attempt to use the program as a substitute for the sacrament of penance.”
I'm not a theologian or a canonist, but wouldn't the simulation of a sacrament be a grave sin? And how is this not a scandalous invitation to such a simulation?
Also, how are we supposed to interpret the phrase "the theological view of St. Peter's Church"? Are individual parishes authorised to hold and/or promulgate their own theological views now?
How is it not also a violation of the Second Commandment?
Where are they saying that they are simulating the Sacrament of Reconciliation? I’m not seeing that anywhere in the article.
“the team, who have also insisted that putting the installation in a confessional was a practical decision meant to encourage “moments of intimacy” with the hologram, but not meant to suggest Catholics attempt to use the program as a substitute for the sacrament of penance.”