I find it truly astonishing how many within the Catholic community perceive Pope Francis as a mere stumble-prone figure due to his shifts in stance, especially on issues like LGBT blessings and Ukraine's sovereignty. While some may view his approach as erratic, the Pope's discernment reflects a deliberate evolution of thought rather than mere caprice, though often communicated in a Machiavellian manner. A Machiavellian communication style can be confusing but it has proven to be effective when dealing with highly divisive issues like these where one wants to effect attitudinal change incrementally.
Intellectual growth is a hallmark of wisdom. My own perspective on the Ukrainian conflict has shifted. Initially, I anticipated that Allied sanctions on Russia would be decisive, only to witness their limited impact. Similarly, I hoped that Putin, recognizing the broader geopolitical stakes, would seek diplomatic avenues. Yet, reality has proven otherwise. Lives lost. Billions spent. Deadlock.
Recognizing the diminishing appetite for a prolonged proxy conflict with Russia, particularly within the United States, it's evident that a pivot towards resolution is coming. Despite the outcome's implications, the Pope’s foresight is astute. Each life now lost , underscores the urgency of his vision.
As one more eloquent than I would express: “Time's unerring narrative shall vindicate his stance, casting him as a visionary whose foresight will echo through the annals of history.”. Said more simply, the Pope's prescience far outweighs any superficial label of incompetence.
And what in Machiavelli's "The Prince" contains one jot or tittle of the Gospel?
If Our Holy Father was even aware of how all his fumbling, his "yes" meaning "no" and "no" meaning "yes" added to his so called ""prescience" is affecting the Church and the world, he, I'd like to think, would be ashamed.
Between his all but banning of the Old Rite, his shows of vengeance and his love of "shock value" who know what he stands for?
His ministry is to confirm his brothers and sisters in the Faith, not confuse them.
On the anniversary of his election he and the Church need a great deal of prayer.
Is it time to consider the possibility that perhaps the Holy Father just isn't that sharp?
I suspect that there are very many people at the Vatican that aren't nearly as sharp as they think they are.
I find it truly astonishing how many within the Catholic community perceive Pope Francis as a mere stumble-prone figure due to his shifts in stance, especially on issues like LGBT blessings and Ukraine's sovereignty. While some may view his approach as erratic, the Pope's discernment reflects a deliberate evolution of thought rather than mere caprice, though often communicated in a Machiavellian manner. A Machiavellian communication style can be confusing but it has proven to be effective when dealing with highly divisive issues like these where one wants to effect attitudinal change incrementally.
Intellectual growth is a hallmark of wisdom. My own perspective on the Ukrainian conflict has shifted. Initially, I anticipated that Allied sanctions on Russia would be decisive, only to witness their limited impact. Similarly, I hoped that Putin, recognizing the broader geopolitical stakes, would seek diplomatic avenues. Yet, reality has proven otherwise. Lives lost. Billions spent. Deadlock.
Recognizing the diminishing appetite for a prolonged proxy conflict with Russia, particularly within the United States, it's evident that a pivot towards resolution is coming. Despite the outcome's implications, the Pope’s foresight is astute. Each life now lost , underscores the urgency of his vision.
As one more eloquent than I would express: “Time's unerring narrative shall vindicate his stance, casting him as a visionary whose foresight will echo through the annals of history.”. Said more simply, the Pope's prescience far outweighs any superficial label of incompetence.
And what in Machiavelli's "The Prince" contains one jot or tittle of the Gospel?
If Our Holy Father was even aware of how all his fumbling, his "yes" meaning "no" and "no" meaning "yes" added to his so called ""prescience" is affecting the Church and the world, he, I'd like to think, would be ashamed.
Between his all but banning of the Old Rite, his shows of vengeance and his love of "shock value" who know what he stands for?
His ministry is to confirm his brothers and sisters in the Faith, not confuse them.
On the anniversary of his election he and the Church need a great deal of prayer.