I don't think you understand the decision, then. It does not mandate lay superiors for every order, it is for a few exceptional cases. Of course an order comprised solely of priests is not going to get a lay superior, as they have no laymen to assume the role.
I don't think you understand the decision, then. It does not mandate lay superiors for every order, it is for a few exceptional cases. Of course an order comprised solely of priests is not going to get a lay superior, as they have no laymen to assume the role.
I don't think you understand the decision, then. It does not mandate lay superiors for every order, it is for a few exceptional cases. Of course an order comprised solely of priests is not going to get a lay superior, as they have no laymen to assume the role.