Watch tastes now withstanding, very scam needed a patsy to pin it all on. Mincione seems to have been that patsy, after all, he’s just a grubby lay financier… not a nice Cardinal like Becciu.
> the tribunal has still, more than six months later, not released the full judicial reasoning for the convictions.
Neat. Since I do not like to ascribe malice I will simply say that if they were at a company as junior engineers their annual review would probably put them on a performance improvement plan in an effort to salvage them through coaching into employees who can do the job they were hired for.
// Despite the slate of decisions in the case being announced in December last year, the tribunal has still, more than six months later, not released the full judicial reasoning for the convictions. Instead, a lengthy communique was issued through the Holy See press office announcing the charges on which various defendants had been found guilty and the sentences imposed.
Without access to the judges’ legal reasoning, Mincione’s UN complaint states, it is effectively impossible to mount a coherent argument — hearings for which are set to begin next month and conclude by the court’s August recess.
As part of the appeal process, lawyers for Mincione are required to specify the grounds on which his conviction is flawed but, they argue, the Vatican judges have thus far refused to publish the rationale for his conviction in the first place.
Sources close to Mincione’s legal team in Rome have told The Pillar that they are expecting the full decision to be released in the coming weeks, but timed to prevent them having adequate opportunity to draft full responses before the appeal hearings begin. //
"The law" is a briar-patch. God help those entrapped therein.
Man, this is troubling. Both ways.
Mincione wears a pricey but not ostentatious watch; therefore, he cannot possibly be guilty of any wrongdoing.
Watch tastes now withstanding, very scam needed a patsy to pin it all on. Mincione seems to have been that patsy, after all, he’s just a grubby lay financier… not a nice Cardinal like Becciu.
> the tribunal has still, more than six months later, not released the full judicial reasoning for the convictions.
Neat. Since I do not like to ascribe malice I will simply say that if they were at a company as junior engineers their annual review would probably put them on a performance improvement plan in an effort to salvage them through coaching into employees who can do the job they were hired for.
Maybe they will call Ed as a witness! Ed at the UN--sounds like a good movie. As good as Mr Smith goes to Washington!
// Despite the slate of decisions in the case being announced in December last year, the tribunal has still, more than six months later, not released the full judicial reasoning for the convictions. Instead, a lengthy communique was issued through the Holy See press office announcing the charges on which various defendants had been found guilty and the sentences imposed.
Without access to the judges’ legal reasoning, Mincione’s UN complaint states, it is effectively impossible to mount a coherent argument — hearings for which are set to begin next month and conclude by the court’s August recess.
As part of the appeal process, lawyers for Mincione are required to specify the grounds on which his conviction is flawed but, they argue, the Vatican judges have thus far refused to publish the rationale for his conviction in the first place.
Sources close to Mincione’s legal team in Rome have told The Pillar that they are expecting the full decision to be released in the coming weeks, but timed to prevent them having adequate opportunity to draft full responses before the appeal hearings begin. //
"The law" is a briar-patch. God help those entrapped therein.
*Michael Jackson eating popcorn meme*