Worth pointing out that Hallow also formally “sponsored” the election night coverage of Fox News Channel. No matter one’s political persuasion, the prominent celebrity and political alliances (not to mention the ostensibly large amount of money behind them) deserve more transparency and accountability.
Worth pointing out that Hallow also formally “sponsored” the election night coverage of Fox News Channel. No matter one’s political persuasion, the prominent celebrity and political alliances (not to mention the ostensibly large amount of money behind them) deserve more transparency and accountability.
Yes, that’s very problematic that they did that. It’s also curious that, to my knowledge, they haven’t partnered with Latino celebrities or celebrities like Jim Gaffigan and Gloria Purvis who could reach people who are not political conservatives.
Gloria Purvis enthusiastically supported the violent, financially mismanaged, and demonstrably corrupt BLM, several of whose leaders have been charged with fraud or have at least had to resign under threat of criminal prosecution. And as poster Andy has pointed out, Jim Gaffigan took his kids to a "Pride" parade. Hallow will deserve to lose support if it partners with people of their ilk.
I'm all for transparency and accountability from Hallow. How about some on Gwen Stefani, who made no bones about her support of Harris. Her leftist bona fides are well-documented. As just one example, The Mirror reported that she "hosted a fundraiser with Michelle Obama at her house, the only president for whom she & Blake [Shelton] have performed is Obama, she's written several left-leaning songs with No Doubt, she has performed at fundraisers for Planned Parenthood & pro-LGBTQ+ organizations."
Hallow made that quite clear by advertising during the coverage, so your point is tautological. No problem whatsoever with transparency or accountability.
Worth pointing out that Hallow also formally “sponsored” the election night coverage of Fox News Channel. No matter one’s political persuasion, the prominent celebrity and political alliances (not to mention the ostensibly large amount of money behind them) deserve more transparency and accountability.
Yes, that’s very problematic that they did that. It’s also curious that, to my knowledge, they haven’t partnered with Latino celebrities or celebrities like Jim Gaffigan and Gloria Purvis who could reach people who are not political conservatives.
Gloria Purvis enthusiastically supported the violent, financially mismanaged, and demonstrably corrupt BLM, several of whose leaders have been charged with fraud or have at least had to resign under threat of criminal prosecution. And as poster Andy has pointed out, Jim Gaffigan took his kids to a "Pride" parade. Hallow will deserve to lose support if it partners with people of their ilk.
I'm all for transparency and accountability from Hallow. How about some on Gwen Stefani, who made no bones about her support of Harris. Her leftist bona fides are well-documented. As just one example, The Mirror reported that she "hosted a fundraiser with Michelle Obama at her house, the only president for whom she & Blake [Shelton] have performed is Obama, she's written several left-leaning songs with No Doubt, she has performed at fundraisers for Planned Parenthood & pro-LGBTQ+ organizations."
Hallow made that quite clear by advertising during the coverage, so your point is tautological. No problem whatsoever with transparency or accountability.