I'm against both reflexive criticism, and also all criticisms that I don't think are warranted (most of them). I think there can be and has been legitimate criticism- for example, a criticism he agreed with himself, his erroneous judgement in the case of Bishop Barros. I think that any criticism should be made according to knowledge, competency and station.
Are you, I wonder truly, against any criticism of Pope Francis, or just the reflexive criticism no matter what he says or does?
I'm against both reflexive criticism, and also all criticisms that I don't think are warranted (most of them). I think there can be and has been legitimate criticism- for example, a criticism he agreed with himself, his erroneous judgement in the case of Bishop Barros. I think that any criticism should be made according to knowledge, competency and station.