Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joseph's avatar

I was homeschooled K-12 and then went to Benedictine, not unlike the students interviewed here. I have a few thoughts I'd like to share, in relation to both homeschooling and BC.

1. Homeschooling can be great, but it's not a cure-all. It requires buy-in from both parents (and the child, to a certain extent) to work. This not only means keeping a consistent schedule and curriculum, but also supplementing those areas where parents aren't as equipped to educate their children—eg, math, science, and foreign languages. I had tutors for high school algebra, calculus, and Latin, since neither of my parents used math regularly or knew Latin. Obviously, tutors are a more expensive option, but co-ops, community college courses, and online programs are also excellent options.

2. Standards are important. Homeschooling is a great way to tailor your child's education to their needs and aptitudes, but it shouldn't be an excuse to ignore subjects you/your child don't like or think are unimportant (*especially* math and science), or to lower the standards on academic performance just to get things over with. I say this because I think it would be doing a genuine disservice to the child to willfully neglect a portion of their education, or to effectively lie to them about their abilities. Obviously, intellectual or learning disabilities will change what standards are reasonable (that's part of what makes homeschooling's flexibility and focus so good!), but that's very much a case-by-case kind of thing. As a personal example, it would have been easy for my parents to give up on making me do math after the gargantuan sophomore-year slog of Algebra II, but they insisted (correctly) that since I was clearly able to go further, I should. That meant doing precalculus and calc I, and although I detested it at the time, it was absolutely good for me (especially when I decided to become a physicist instead of a classicist naval officer. God laughs when you tell Him your plans.)

3. Homeschooling can't (and shouldn't) keep kids in the bubble forever. At some point, if children are going to mature, they have to face the reality of the world, including its evils and imperfections, in more than just a storybook fashion. That doesn't mean unfettered exposure to temptations or removing moral standards, but it does mean being honest about the fact that most people aren't going to think like your child or make room for their particular preferences, and that they're going to have to work with and be around them, even if they vehemently disagree. In today's climate, that especially means being honest about the existence of LGBT people, pro-choice people, and atheists, and also honest about the fact that you can work with, respect, care for, and even like people you strongly disagree with.

4. Perhaps my most biased plea, as a Catholic physicist: please don't use weird Protestant young-earth creationist books to teach your kids science. It's okay to delay touchy topics like evolution until an appropriate time, but scientific education should be done in light of the Catholic Church's teaching on the relationship between faith and reason, not "This disagrees with my literal interpretation of the Bible, so it must be wrong." The Catechism is the first and best place to start, closely followed by JPII's Fides et Ratio. After that, Augustine's five(!) commentaries on interpreting Genesis are a wonderful way to show how, well before the advent of modern science and cosmology, the meaning of Genesis' creation account was up for significant debate, and there were multiple ways to faithfully interpret the book beyond hyperliteralism. Augustine takes both allegorical and literal views, the latter not meaning six 24-hour days (he thought it was instantaneous), but rather that Genesis describes an actual act of creation by God. Conversely, young-earth creationism derives from a form of sola scriptura interpretation combined with a 17th-century Irish Anglican bishop's attempt to calculate the age of the world with the best scholarly knowledge of his time, making it both bad theology *and* out-of-date-at-best science.

Expand full comment
Fr. James Farfaglia's avatar

I have always been a firm supporter of homeschooling families. They are the backbone of any parish that I have been assigned to. I am very grateful for their witness. Back in the late 1960’s and throughout the 1970’s when, for the most part, a lot of Catholic schools went through the tumultous post-Vatican II crisis, my parents helped run and develop a parent run elementary school in Ridgefield, CT. Holy Innocents school at a huge impact on my younger brother and sister. Both my other sister and myself were already in high school when Holy Innoncents school began. My youngest sister who attended elementary school at Holy Innocents is a traditionalist Dominican nun doing amazing work. She attributes much of her vocation to those formative years at Holy Innocnets. My brother, who attended Holy innocents, is an awesome dad, fervent Catholic, and an amazing husband. He says that Holy Innocents was life changing and formative. Parent run schools, like Holy Innocents, started before the homeschooling movement took off. I am a firm supporter of homeschooling families.

Expand full comment
42 more comments...