I see no way that Strickland's words could be construed as “publicly incit[ing] hatred or animosity against the Apostolic See or the Ordinary because of some act of ecclesiastical office.” He reiterates again and again his love for the Holy Father and his respect of the office of the Papacy. Is it now a canonical crime to disagree with t…
I see no way that Strickland's words could be construed as “publicly incit[ing] hatred or animosity against the Apostolic See or the Ordinary because of some act of ecclesiastical office.” He reiterates again and again his love for the Holy Father and his respect of the office of the Papacy. Is it now a canonical crime to disagree with the Pope's words at an informal meeting with youth in Singapore?
I see no way that Strickland's words could be construed as “publicly incit[ing] hatred or animosity against the Apostolic See or the Ordinary because of some act of ecclesiastical office.” He reiterates again and again his love for the Holy Father and his respect of the office of the Papacy. Is it now a canonical crime to disagree with the Pope's words at an informal meeting with youth in Singapore?