27 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
Bisbee's avatar

I'm afraid to ask, though it is a stupid idea.

In the US most dioceses require a "suitability letter" sent from the priest's diocesan chancery to the diocese where a travelling priest wishes to celebrate the Sacraments.

It is a drawn out process in some places but respects the priest, his privacy and is not "hackable."

Expand full comment
Fr. Jeffrey Moore's avatar

Speaking personally, I HATE the suitability letter system, and would much prefer this card.

When I travel, I have to plan out every Mass weeks ahead of time and get in touch with a whole slew of different priests to ask "permission" to concelebrate Mass (a permission Can. 903 does not allow them to deny, but not everyone realizes that). I would much prefer the flexibility that this card offers, of being able to walk into any sacristy 10 minutes before Mass and suit up, as is possible in Europe. I hate not being able to be spontaneous on vacation.

Expand full comment
Tacitus's avatar

Does canon 903 really say they must let you concelebrate?

Expand full comment
Fr. Jeffrey Moore's avatar

There are nuances. Most exactly, if I can prove I am a priest, they must allow me to celebrate Mass in the church. But it does not have to be a specific Mass or a public Mass. They can give me a side altar at 7:00am if they really want, but it is usually easier just to allow me to concelebrate.

Expand full comment
Hans's avatar

I'm not that fond of the letter system as a deacon, either.

Expand full comment