Maybe an analogous situation: a US court might say "We can't say 'Harvard must admit John Doe from Poughkeepsie', but we can say 'Harvard isn't allowed to admit or not admit John Doe from Poughkeepsie because of his race'
Maybe an analogous situation: a US court might say "We can't say 'Harvard must admit John Doe from Poughkeepsie', but we can say 'Harvard isn't allowed to admit or not admit John Doe from Poughkeepsie because of his race'
I understand your analogy. It makes sense. But, that's not how this Belgian situation reads to me. However, I'll just chalk it up to one more of life's mysteries that will be revealed to me at the end of time (the Lord knows there are a lot of them).
Maybe an analogous situation: a US court might say "We can't say 'Harvard must admit John Doe from Poughkeepsie', but we can say 'Harvard isn't allowed to admit or not admit John Doe from Poughkeepsie because of his race'
I understand your analogy. It makes sense. But, that's not how this Belgian situation reads to me. However, I'll just chalk it up to one more of life's mysteries that will be revealed to me at the end of time (the Lord knows there are a lot of them).