Possibly. The court wasn't ruling against the bishop refusing to *ordain* the woman, only against him refusing to allow her into the classes for deacons and deacons' wives. Clearly the purpose of the class was not something the court considered relevant.
Possibly. The court wasn't ruling against the bishop refusing to *ordain* the woman, only against him refusing to allow her into the classes for deacons and deacons' wives. Clearly the purpose of the class was not something the court considered relevant.
Possibly. The court wasn't ruling against the bishop refusing to *ordain* the woman, only against him refusing to allow her into the classes for deacons and deacons' wives. Clearly the purpose of the class was not something the court considered relevant.