> It's obvious that most of the folks who are mad just don't like their favorite priest getting disciplined for clearly breaking a rule that prudent priests can and do easily follow.
What's the evidence for this assertion? I'm sure there are some mad for this particular reason, but taking them to be "most" seems hard to support.
> It's obvious that most of the folks who are mad just don't like their favorite priest getting disciplined for clearly breaking a rule that prudent priests can and do easily follow.
What's the evidence for this assertion? I'm sure there are some mad for this particular reason, but taking them to be "most" seems hard to support.
I've been reading what's happening on four different social media platforms with about half a dozen different journalists and bloggers and dozens of their commenters. It doesn't take a weatherman to see which way the wind blows.
> It's obvious that most of the folks who are mad just don't like their favorite priest getting disciplined for clearly breaking a rule that prudent priests can and do easily follow.
What's the evidence for this assertion? I'm sure there are some mad for this particular reason, but taking them to be "most" seems hard to support.
I've been reading what's happening on four different social media platforms with about half a dozen different journalists and bloggers and dozens of their commenters. It doesn't take a weatherman to see which way the wind blows.
That is not very compelling evidence.