I’m surprised that someone would use the inflammatory statement of “how can the Church justify the cruelty from a troubled bishop” apply to the rights and duties of the bishop’s office to respond to a scandal in diocese that the bishop is responsible. Obviously, if there is a scandal in the jurisdiction of the diocese church officials ne…
I’m surprised that someone would use the inflammatory statement of “how can the Church justify the cruelty from a troubled bishop” apply to the rights and duties of the bishop’s office to respond to a scandal in diocese that the bishop is responsible. Obviously, if there is a scandal in the jurisdiction of the diocese church officials need to involve themselves in administering a remedy. This action must fall on the bishops office whether he be a saint or sinner. Who are we to judge? Perhaps we should pray, instead of making such judgments.
I’m surprised that someone would use the inflammatory statement of “how can the Church justify the cruelty from a troubled bishop” apply to the rights and duties of the bishop’s office to respond to a scandal in diocese that the bishop is responsible. Obviously, if there is a scandal in the jurisdiction of the diocese church officials need to involve themselves in administering a remedy. This action must fall on the bishops office whether he be a saint or sinner. Who are we to judge? Perhaps we should pray, instead of making such judgments.