5 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Jen's avatar

The Nuns own it… but then Rome made Bishop Olson the Nuns direct superior with authority to manage their assets, if I’m not mistaken.

Expand full comment
Mike Gannon's avatar

Ecclesiastical authority, but that doesn't translate to civil authority. I know of one instance in which the prior of a monastery signed a civil contract that, canonically speaking, he didn't have the power to sign (his provincial should have been the one to approve it). Nevertheless, the community was bound by it, because US civil law is not bound by canon law.

Expand full comment
Jen's avatar

Should be interesting to see what happens then.

Expand full comment
P Rubric's avatar

Unfortunately this is not correct.

As Commissary, the Bishop has no involvement in financial or property assets.

This was also the case before he found someone in Rome to make him Commissary. He was not made Commissary by the Cardinal Prefect, but an Archbishop with a history of closing Monasteries in Europe. In our Church men get to make all the rules and break all the rules. Bishop Hubbard who died today is exhibit #1

Expand full comment
Jen's avatar

The whole Commissary commission looks pretty sketchy, it’s true. But regardless, it happened. And it holds weight because the Church has the authority to do it. The Church is the Body of Christ & sometimes the Body of Christ dying. We have to honor that or Catholicism becomes civil and democratic vs Apostolic.

Expand full comment