Except that it isn’t. Other media sources now say that Cipriani has been accused, credibly, of sexual abuse. Had The Pillar focused on Argentinian clerical politics, it would have missed the real story while impinging upon the dignity of the Holy Father. I don’t know why you’re carrying water for Cipriani at this point.
Except that it isn’t. Other media sources now say that Cipriani has been accused, credibly, of sexual abuse. Had The Pillar focused on Argentinian clerical politics, it would have missed the real story while impinging upon the dignity of the Holy Father. I don’t know why you’re carrying water for Cipriani at this point.
What does "credibly accused" mean? You are innocent until proven guilty. Cardinal Pell was also "credibly accused" and found innocent. There was another Cardinal, Henryk Gulbinowicz of Wroclaw, Poland, who was "credibly accused" and sanctioned to not perform any public ministry. He just happened to be the most vehemently anti-Communist bishop in Poland.it turned out after his death that all the accusations came from men who were found in Polish Communist secret police archives to be agents who purposely made up stories which the Church investigators initially fell for. Like with Pell, it is the civil investigations that often reveal the truth. I hope Cardinal Cipriani has his day in court where rules of evidence will determine whether he is guilty or not. Nonetheless, while Cardinal Cipriani, a rival to the Pope, is penalized, Father Rupnik, who the Pope likes, is working without any restrictions in Slovenia after raping several religious sisters. Just seems suspicious.
It seems to me that your motivating theory here is corruption by the current pope. I see no evidence of this, relative to Cipriani. Ongoing discussion, therefore, strikes me as futile. Peace and blessings to you, though.
Except that it isn’t. Other media sources now say that Cipriani has been accused, credibly, of sexual abuse. Had The Pillar focused on Argentinian clerical politics, it would have missed the real story while impinging upon the dignity of the Holy Father. I don’t know why you’re carrying water for Cipriani at this point.
See: https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/261833/prominent-cardinal-denies-allegations-of-sexual-abuse-that-led-to-disciplinary-measures
What does "credibly accused" mean? You are innocent until proven guilty. Cardinal Pell was also "credibly accused" and found innocent. There was another Cardinal, Henryk Gulbinowicz of Wroclaw, Poland, who was "credibly accused" and sanctioned to not perform any public ministry. He just happened to be the most vehemently anti-Communist bishop in Poland.it turned out after his death that all the accusations came from men who were found in Polish Communist secret police archives to be agents who purposely made up stories which the Church investigators initially fell for. Like with Pell, it is the civil investigations that often reveal the truth. I hope Cardinal Cipriani has his day in court where rules of evidence will determine whether he is guilty or not. Nonetheless, while Cardinal Cipriani, a rival to the Pope, is penalized, Father Rupnik, who the Pope likes, is working without any restrictions in Slovenia after raping several religious sisters. Just seems suspicious.
It seems to me that your motivating theory here is corruption by the current pope. I see no evidence of this, relative to Cipriani. Ongoing discussion, therefore, strikes me as futile. Peace and blessings to you, though.