Which was denied by Cardinal Mueller and again he never had a chance to defend himself against those allegations. If he took money from the Vatican, he should be tried in court and convicted of embezzlement. Otherwise its hearsay that should not be repeated by any news outlet more reputable than the National Enquirer. The truth is that P…
Which was denied by Cardinal Mueller and again he never had a chance to defend himself against those allegations. If he took money from the Vatican, he should be tried in court and convicted of embezzlement. Otherwise its hearsay that should not be repeated by any news outlet more reputable than the National Enquirer. The truth is that Pope Francis told Cardinal Mueller to leave as his 5 year term was up and did not give him any reasons for the dismissal besides that. If there were reasons, then the Pope was unjust in not telling him what the reasons were, instead preferring others to leak information out which then the Pillar picked up.
We know how some people in the Vatican have ways to destroy certain people's reputation, like they tried to do that with Cardinal Pell, Cardinal Burke, and Libero Milone who tried to fix the Vatican finances as Auditor General but was fired and defamed instead.
If what the Pillar wrote was incorrect Müller could have sued them. They did not say he embezzled but that some of his department's money was moved inappropriately to avoid the work of Libero Milone in trying to straighten up Vatican finances.
Cardinal Mueller was dismissed on July 1, 2017 and Libero Milone was fired in June of that same year, which happens to be around the same time when Cardinal Pell was convicted in Australia. At that time Cardinal Becchiu was running the show and allegedly lying to the Pope Francis. So Pope Francis would fire Mueller at the same time when the watchdogs for the Vatican Milone and Pell were being conveniently removed, when Becchiu was calling the shots, the Cardinal who was eventually convicted for financial crimes, but not until 2024. The possibilities are that (1) Mueller was hated by Becchiu and falsely accused like Milone and Pell were or (2) Mueller was in league with Becchiu in committing financial crimes but then Pope Francis would have kept Mueller in place like he did Becchiu for many more years, even advancing him to Cardinal or (3) simply Mueller was removed because he was too conservative to allow for Pope Francis' liberal reforms to occur under his watch (and this is the most likely cause).
To sue someone in the U.S. requires a lot of money to pay for a lawyer. Cardinal Pell did not sue anyone either for the defamation he received from the press. That is really not a good argument for declaring someone innocent or guilty of an act.
Which was denied by Cardinal Mueller and again he never had a chance to defend himself against those allegations. If he took money from the Vatican, he should be tried in court and convicted of embezzlement. Otherwise its hearsay that should not be repeated by any news outlet more reputable than the National Enquirer. The truth is that Pope Francis told Cardinal Mueller to leave as his 5 year term was up and did not give him any reasons for the dismissal besides that. If there were reasons, then the Pope was unjust in not telling him what the reasons were, instead preferring others to leak information out which then the Pillar picked up.
We know how some people in the Vatican have ways to destroy certain people's reputation, like they tried to do that with Cardinal Pell, Cardinal Burke, and Libero Milone who tried to fix the Vatican finances as Auditor General but was fired and defamed instead.
If what the Pillar wrote was incorrect Müller could have sued them. They did not say he embezzled but that some of his department's money was moved inappropriately to avoid the work of Libero Milone in trying to straighten up Vatican finances.
Cardinal Mueller was dismissed on July 1, 2017 and Libero Milone was fired in June of that same year, which happens to be around the same time when Cardinal Pell was convicted in Australia. At that time Cardinal Becchiu was running the show and allegedly lying to the Pope Francis. So Pope Francis would fire Mueller at the same time when the watchdogs for the Vatican Milone and Pell were being conveniently removed, when Becchiu was calling the shots, the Cardinal who was eventually convicted for financial crimes, but not until 2024. The possibilities are that (1) Mueller was hated by Becchiu and falsely accused like Milone and Pell were or (2) Mueller was in league with Becchiu in committing financial crimes but then Pope Francis would have kept Mueller in place like he did Becchiu for many more years, even advancing him to Cardinal or (3) simply Mueller was removed because he was too conservative to allow for Pope Francis' liberal reforms to occur under his watch (and this is the most likely cause).
To sue someone in the U.S. requires a lot of money to pay for a lawyer. Cardinal Pell did not sue anyone either for the defamation he received from the press. That is really not a good argument for declaring someone innocent or guilty of an act.