5 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
ALT's avatar

Possibly part of the reason Cardinal Pell could be vindicated, is because his case was public and was therefore handled (eventually) by people competent in investigations.

Expand full comment
Neophyte's avatar

Yes, but I don't it should cost 400 days in a maximum security prison to clear your name of bogus abuse allegations.

Expand full comment
ALT's avatar

Yes, it certainly does help if the people competent in investigations (and not corrupt) come earlier in the process, rather than later.

Cardinal Cipriani might not be prison, but he has had this accusation for over 5 years, and no process that could actually determine guilt or innocence has even started. Cardinal Pell was exonerated 3 years after his charge.

Expand full comment
Rebecca's avatar

I donтАЩt know, Cardinal Cipriani does not necessarily seem like a reliable reporter of events here. I would like to see clarification from the appropriate Vatican authorities. (Note: I had never heard of Cardinal Cipriani before today and know nothing about him, but if everything reported here is true, his story seems confused at best.)

Expand full comment
ALT's avatar

I wouldn't consider him reliable. I don't consider the Vatican authorities to be reliable either.

There are millennia of good reasons for public trials, in favor of some accused, and against others.

Expand full comment