Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Father Edward Horkan's avatar

While it is good to hear that Bishop Chappetto was cleared, there are still some serious unresolved issues, including:

1. Why did the investigation take two years? The investigation determined that the claim that Bishop Chapetto did not report the information he had received was "manifestly unfounded."

It should have been fairly easy to determine whether he reported the information or not.

2. If he did report the information to those with the ability to resolve the problem, then why was it not resolved for the 13 months between the initial memo and the final removal of Fr. Okrokoto? It appears that other authorities in the Church were negligent, but it does not seem that anyone is being held responsible.

3. Overall, here as elsewhere, the lack of transparency about the course of the investigation and the evidence involved is unfair to both the clerics and the faithful at large. If a cleric is found guilty, or that the accusations against him is credible (a term with many different meanings) his supporters say that he is being railroaded. If a cleric is cleared, many critics will say that there has been a coverup. Given past history, both types of suspicion are very understandable. The authorities are telling the public, "You do not need to know the information. Just trust us to make the right decision." That response is inadequate and even insulting to our intelligence.

Expand full comment
Bridget's avatar

This is the level of transparency that we have all come to expect: falling somewhere short of the classic "mistakes were made" but not quite as inscrutable as "hexapodia as a key insight".

Expand full comment
8 more comments...