In light of RDB’s comment - I don’t believe that anything was truly “snuck” in. All the bishops are aware of the issue, proposed texts and the rules of engagement. Thus the fact that the change was made with relatively little controversy is, I believe, further evidence of the fact that the bishops who disagree with the priority of life (…
In light of RDB’s comment - I don’t believe that anything was truly “snuck” in. All the bishops are aware of the issue, proposed texts and the rules of engagement. Thus the fact that the change was made with relatively little controversy is, I believe, further evidence of the fact that the bishops who disagree with the priority of life (and therefore ending abortion in this case) are intent upon their “long game” which is to pack the Vatican with people who are in agreement with them.
In light of RDB’s comment - I don’t believe that anything was truly “snuck” in. All the bishops are aware of the issue, proposed texts and the rules of engagement. Thus the fact that the change was made with relatively little controversy is, I believe, further evidence of the fact that the bishops who disagree with the priority of life (and therefore ending abortion in this case) are intent upon their “long game” which is to pack the Vatican with people who are in agreement with them.