I would suggest this came from a mutual understanding that, while there is disagreement within the conference on the matter, they already know which side has the votes. Past debates on the matter have only increased acrimony without changing votes, and this year was not going to be any different. So, they might as well just vote on it and get on with the proceedings.
I would suggest this came from a mutual understanding that, while there is disagreement within the conference on the matter, they already know which side has the votes. Past debates on the matter have only increased acrimony without changing votes, and this year was not going to be any different. So, they might as well just vote on it and get on with the proceedings.
I would suggest this came from a mutual understanding that, while there is disagreement within the conference on the matter, they already know which side has the votes. Past debates on the matter have only increased acrimony without changing votes, and this year was not going to be any different. So, they might as well just vote on it and get on with the proceedings.