Not necessarily Apples to Apples, but the removal of Bishop Strickland compared to the removal (resignation) of Bishop Stika need to come to light. The "Power of the Cardinals" in Stika's back pocket obviously allowed him to resign instead of being removed from office. He should not have the title Emeritus. It seems that both of these in…
Not necessarily Apples to Apples, but the removal of Bishop Strickland compared to the removal (resignation) of Bishop Stika need to come to light. The "Power of the Cardinals" in Stika's back pocket obviously allowed him to resign instead of being removed from office. He should not have the title Emeritus. It seems that both of these inquires have not been made public, which once again leads to cover up and lack of confidence in THE CHURCH. The pew sitting Catholic deserves the truth and justice. Abuse, whether physical, sexual, financial, whatever has no place in the church , especially the leadership
Not necessarily Apples to Apples, but the removal of Bishop Strickland compared to the removal (resignation) of Bishop Stika need to come to light. The "Power of the Cardinals" in Stika's back pocket obviously allowed him to resign instead of being removed from office. He should not have the title Emeritus. It seems that both of these inquires have not been made public, which once again leads to cover up and lack of confidence in THE CHURCH. The pew sitting Catholic deserves the truth and justice. Abuse, whether physical, sexual, financial, whatever has no place in the church , especially the leadership
To be fair, Strickland was offered the opportunity to resign. He just said he wouldn’t. The rest, spot on.