It seems like a question for an authority different in nature than “canonists.” Certainly their views are worth noting. But the determination seems outside their authority.
It seems like a question for an authority different in nature than “canonists.” Certainly their views are worth noting. But the determination seems outside their authority.
An interesting article, thank you Edgar, but does anyone really need to waste time in investigating whether Francis is a false pope? It seems bizarre to argue that Benedict didn't resign the papacy when it's clear from his behaviour that he did.
It seems like a question for an authority different in nature than “canonists.” Certainly their views are worth noting. But the determination seems outside their authority.
An interesting article, thank you Edgar, but does anyone really need to waste time in investigating whether Francis is a false pope? It seems bizarre to argue that Benedict didn't resign the papacy when it's clear from his behaviour that he did.