The cardinal’s work on the Catechism is undoubtedly his greatest contribution and for this he deserves much praise.
As for his theological perspective, I think he always had some left ward tendencies, but what separated him from more liberal clergyman was his reverence of revelation and his resourcement outlook. He always saw Revelation, …
The cardinal’s work on the Catechism is undoubtedly his greatest contribution and for this he deserves much praise.
As for his theological perspective, I think he always had some left ward tendencies, but what separated him from more liberal clergyman was his reverence of revelation and his resourcement outlook. He always saw Revelation, Tradition, and the Fathers as authoritative and not to be relativized.
The cardinal’s work on the Catechism is undoubtedly his greatest contribution and for this he deserves much praise.
As for his theological perspective, I think he always had some left ward tendencies, but what separated him from more liberal clergyman was his reverence of revelation and his resourcement outlook. He always saw Revelation, Tradition, and the Fathers as authoritative and not to be relativized.