I think we should be cautious about throwing around the “330,000” number without being very clear that this was not actually a direct finding of the report, but an extrapolation. I know the article says “estimated”, but even that, I think, gives more weight to it than it deserves.
I do not believe it serves the cause of truth to use a num…
I think we should be cautious about throwing around the “330,000” number without being very clear that this was not actually a direct finding of the report, but an extrapolation. I know the article says “estimated”, but even that, I think, gives more weight to it than it deserves.
I do not believe it serves the cause of truth to use a number, that was derived from potentially flawed methodology, by enemies of the Church; let us deal and respond to actual victims and abusers, not hypothetical ones.
I think we should be cautious about throwing around the “330,000” number without being very clear that this was not actually a direct finding of the report, but an extrapolation. I know the article says “estimated”, but even that, I think, gives more weight to it than it deserves.
I do not believe it serves the cause of truth to use a number, that was derived from potentially flawed methodology, by enemies of the Church; let us deal and respond to actual victims and abusers, not hypothetical ones.