12 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Corbie's avatar

Wait…the bishop walked back his teaching on the inviolability of the seal of confession? Help me understand.

Expand full comment
Andrea's avatar

I was reading this article expecting the worse, but instead it was ok, that is until the end.

I am not really sure what they are saying there at all, and the pillars choppy style of writing/editing (why????) does not help clarity at all.

Expand full comment
Luke Coppen's avatar

As I understand it, the archbishop has always upheld the inviolability of the seal of confession, but offered a diplomatic apology on that occasion for his “clumsy wording,” which was misinterpreted as saying the Church was a law unto itself.

Expand full comment
Andrea's avatar

Meaning?

Expand full comment
Andrea's avatar

Thanks for that. The links are dated Oct 2021, though. A misprint in all three?

In any case, in the first one the writer is rightly aghast by that comment. In the last one Karine Dalle, the communications director of the French bishops’ conference is reported to have said that: “There will certainly be some adjustments proposed, which Rome will accept or not. But no, in no case did Archbishop de Moulins-Beaufort say that the seal of confession would be put aside. He never said that.”

From what I read, he did say that. Probably he misspoke, but he did say it.

Expand full comment
Patrick Fasano's avatar

The report was released (and the bishop’s comments were made) in Oct. 2021.

Expand full comment
Tom OP's avatar

If an archbishop in the US said "the law of the Church is more important than the Constitution" there would be similar blowback in US media, especially in media hostile to Catholicism and I imagine there would be some similar kind of clarification by the archbishop.

Expand full comment